Effect assessment of the application value of evidence-based nursing intervention in operating room nursing: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The advantages of evidence-based nursing (EBN) intervention in health care settings have been widely disseminated to nurses throughout the world. More researches are reporting the effectiveness of EBN intervention in operating room nursing. However, the results are inconsistent. This study focuses on conducting a meta-analysis and systematic evaluation aimed at determining the usefulness of EBN intervention in operating room nursing. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis for Protocols criteria were used to write this paper. We will look for relevant studies from 2 Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang database and also from 3 English databases such as Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE), to locate all relevant randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessing the application value of EBN intervention in operating room nursing from their commencement to June 2021. Separately, 2 authors will choose the studies, do the data extract and conduct the assessment probing into the likelihood of bias. If there is a disagreement, it will be resolved by the third author. RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 15.0 software will be used to conduct the meta-analysis. RESULTS: The usefulness of EBN intervention in operating room nursing will be assessed in this study. CONCLUSION: The purpose of this research is to conclude the value of EBN intervention in operating room nursing and the quality of current data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Since there is no requirement for data on the individual patient, hence there will be no need for ethical approval. OSF NUMBER: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/MSXNF.

Leveraging Academic-Clinical Partnerships to Create an Operating Room Nurse Pipeline.

This article describes an academic-clinical partnership program between a school of nursing and an American Nurse Credentialing Center Magnet®- and National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center based on a shared vision and multifaceted for optimal new graduate operating room (OR) recruitment and use of clinical partner resources. The program, now in its 3rd year, has a 100% retention rate among the cohorts. Implementing a multifaceted OR partnership program based on nursing theory is a strategy for workforce development to increase retention of new graduate OR nurses.

The Vanguard Study: Human Performance Evaluation of UK National Organ Retrieval Service Teams Utilizing a Single Scrub Practitioner in Multiorgan Retrieval.

BACKGROUND: The National Organ Retrieval Service (NORS) 2015 review recommended a single scrub practitioner provide support simultaneously to abdominal and cardiothoracic teams in UK multiorgan retrieval. Previously, this model had been used only by the combined abdominal and cardiac team in Scotland. This study reports the impact on performance as part of the Vanguard project, which utilized the single scrub practitioner role with 5 NORS teams, to determine applicability United Kingdom wide. METHODS: Participants comprised members of abdominal (n = 56) and cardiothoracic (n = 54) teams attending UK thoraco-abdominal retrievals. Data were collected by validated psychometric scales to assess individual workload, anxiety, confidence, demands/coping resources, and teamwork. Additional data were collected through open comments and quantitative data describing context and outcome of retrieval. RESULTS: Abdominal and cardiothoracic teams showed different responses when using single (Vanguard) or dual scrub practitioners (Standard). Vanguard configuration was associated with significantly higher anxiety for abdominal but not cardiothoracic teams. Perceived workload increased for abdominal teams during Vanguard but decreased for cardiothoracic teams. Scrub practitioners reported elevated anxiety and decreased confidence in retrievals using Vanguard configuration. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large study examining human performance during organ retrieval in the United Kingdom. Despite previous regional success, this study showed a significant negative impact of the single scrub practitioner when extrapolated widely to UK teams. As a result of this study, NORS declined to implement the single scrub model. These data support the use of human performance analysis as an essential part of successful development in organ retrieval practice.

Dificuldades de enfermeiros na segurança do paciente em centro cirúrgico: estudo exploratório / Difficulties of nurses in patient safety in the surgical center: an exploratory study / Dificultades del enfermero en la seguridad del paciente en centro quirúrgico: un estudio exploratorio

OBJETIVO: Descrever as dificuldades de enfermeiros na gestão da segurança do paciente no centro cirúrgico. MÉTODO: Estudo exploratório descritivo, com abordagem quanti-qualitativa, por meio de um survey on-line com 204 enfermeiros de centro cirúrgico de diferentes regiões do Brasil. O questionário continha dados de caracterização socioprofissional e uma questão aberta. Para análise, adotou-se estatística descritiva e análise textual com suporte do software IRAMUTEQ. RESULTADO: Obtiveram-se três classes semânticas: (1) Suporte organizacional (35,6%); (2) Conflitos interpessoais no trabalho (38,3%) e (3) Envolvimento da equipe de saúde no checklist de cirurgia segura (25,8%). CONCLUSÃO: as dificuldades de enfermeiros para a gestão da segurança do paciente no centro cirúrgico relacionam-se principalmente às relações interpessoais no ambiente de trabalho e ao suporte organizacional.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the nurses' difficulties in managing patient safety in the surgical center. METHOD: A descriptive exploratory study, with a quantitative and qualitative approach, conducted by means of an online survey with 204 nurses working in the surgical centers from different Brazilian regions. The questionnaire contained data on socio-professional characterization and an open question. For analysis, descriptive statistics and textual analysis were adopted with the support of the IRAMUTEQ software. RESULTS: Three semantic classes were obtained: (1) Organizational support (35.6%); (2) Interpersonal conflicts at work (38.3%); and (3) Involvement of the health team in the safe surgery checklist (25.8%). CONCLUSION: The nurses' difficulties in managing patient safety in the surgical center are mainly related to interpersonal relationships in the workplace and to organizational support.

OBJETIVO: Describir las dificultades del enfermero para gestionar la seguridad del paciente en el centro quirúrgico. MÉTODO: Estudio exploratorio descriptivo, con abordaje cuantitativo y cualitativo, a través de una survey online con 204 enfermeros de centros quirúrgicos de diferentes regiones de Brasil. El cuestionario contenía datos de caracterización socioprofesional y una pregunta abierta. Para el análisis se adoptó estadística descriptiva y análisis textual con el apoyo del software IRAMUTEQ. RESULTADO: Se obtuvieron tres clases semánticas: (1) Apoyo organizacional (35,6%); (2) Conflictos interpersonales en el trabajo (38,3%) y (3) Participación del equipo de salud en la checklist de cirugía segura (25,8%). CONCLUSIÓN: Las dificultades de los enfermeros para gestionar la seguridad del paciente en el centro quirúrgico están relacionadas principalmente con las relaciones interpersonales en el lugar de trabajo y el apoyo organizacional.

Flujo de información en el área quirúrgica / No disponible

No disponible

La enfermería de quirófano ante la Hipertermia Maligna. ¿Estamos preparados? / Surgical Nurse on Malignant Hyperthermia. Are we prepared?

OBJETIVO PRINCIPAL: Evaluar el conocimiento de la Hipertermia Maligna (HM) entre los profesionales de Enfermería de quirófano. METODOLOGÍA: Estudio descriptivo transversal con 169 profesionales de Enfermería de quirófano. RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES: La puntuación total de los cuestionarios alcanzó un promedio de 4,8 (±2,18) puntos sobre 10 totales. Disponer de un protocolo para la asistencia de episodios de HM, se relacionó de forma significativa con un conocimiento adecuado. CONCLUSIÓN PRINCIPAL: Los profesionales de Enfermería de quirófano presentan unos inadecuados niveles de conocimiento sobre la HM y su manejo. Es necesaria una mejora en la preparación de las enfermeras para atender a un paciente en crisis de HM

MAIN OBJECTIVE: Assessing knowledge levels of the surgical nurses regarding Malignant Hyperthermia (MH) and its management. METHODOLOGY: Cross-sectional descriptive study among 169 surgical nurses. MAIN RESULTS: The total score of the questionnaires reached an average of 4.8 (± 2.18) points out of 10 total. Having an standart operating procedute for the assistance of MH episodes was significantly related to adequate knowledge. MAIN CONCLUSION: Surgical nurses have inadequate levels on managing MH and delivering inmediate care. It is necessary to provide specific trainning on MH for surgical nurses to prepare them to safely assist patients suffering MH crisis

Managing complexity in the operating room: a group interview study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical work in the operating room (OR) is considered challenging as it is complex, dynamic, and often time- and resource-constrained. Important characteristics for successful management of complexity include adaptations and adaptive coordination when managing expected and unexpected events. However, there is a lack of explorative research addressing what makes things go well and how OR staff describe they do when responding to challenges and compensating for constraints. The aim of this study was therefore to explore how complexity is managed as expressed by operating room nurses, registered nurse anesthetists, and surgeons, and how these professionals adapt to create safe care in the OR. METHOD: Data for this qualitative explorative study were collected via group interviews with three professional groups of the OR-team, including operating room nurses, registered nurse anesthetists and operating and assisting surgeons in four group interview sessions, one for each profession except for ORNs for which two separate interviews were performed. The audio-taped transcripts were transcribed verbatim and analyzed by inductive qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The findings revealed three generic categories covering ways of creating safe care in the OR: preconditions and resources, planning and preparing for the expected and unexpected, and adapting to the unexpected. In each generic category, one sub-category emerged that was common to all three professions: coordinating and reaffirming information, creating a plan for the patient and undergoing mental preparation, and prioritizing and solving upcoming problems, respectively. CONCLUSION: Creating safe care in the OR should be understood as a process of planning and preparing in order to manage challenging and complex work processes. OR staff need preconditions and resources such as having experience and coordinating and reaffirming information, to make sense of different situations. This requires a mental model, which is created through planning and preparing in different ways. Some situations are repetitive and easier to plan for but planning for the unexpected requires anticipation from experience. The main results strengthen that abilities described in the theory of resilience are used by OR staff as a strategy to manage complexity in the OR.

Colocación de pulseras identificativas y de grupo sanguíneo en quirófano de ortopedia / Use of identification and blood type wristbands at the orthopedic surgery operating room

OBJETIVO: determinar si es correcta la identificación a través de las pulseras identificativas y de grupo sanguíneo en los pacientes intervenidos de cirugía ortopédica. MÉTODO: estudio descriptivo transversal. La población de estudio fueron los pacientes intervenidos de cirugía ortopédica de prótesis de rodilla y cadera en el Hospital Universitario de Burgos. Técnica de recogida de los datos: observación directa. Variables de estudio: sexo; edad; tipo de cirugía; lado de la cirugía; colocación de pulseras; portador de vía venosa; canalización de vía en quirófano; calibre; retirada de las pulseras; sustitución de las pulseras; tiempo sin pulseras; vía y pulsera en el mismo brazo y planta de origen. RESULTADOS: se analizaron 153 casos. El 100% de los pacientes contaba con una pulsera identificativa y el 98% tenía pulsera de grupo sanguíneo. Fue necesario retirar por colocación incorrecta el 27% de las pulseras identificativas y el 29% de las de grupo sanguíneo; todas fueron sustituidas. La media del tiempo que el paciente pasó en el quirófano sin pulsera con datos personales fue de 51,62 minutos y sin la pulsera de grupo sanguíneo de 50,36 minutos. CONCLUSIONES: la gran mayoría de los pacientes se encontraban correctamente identificados a través de las dos pulseras, aunque por necesidades de la cirugía en algunos casos debían retirarse quedando los pacientes sin identificar durante aproximadamente una hora. La comunicación e información con las enfermeras resulta fundamental para mejorar la calidad de los cuidados y la seguridad del enfermo

OBJECTIVE: to determine if there is an adequate use of identification and blood type wristbands in patients undergoing ortophedic surgery. METHOD: a cross-sectional descriptive study. The study population consisted of patients who had undergone orthopedic surgery for knee and hip prosthesis at the Hospital Universitario de Burgos. Data collection technique: direct observation. Study variables: gender, age, type of surgery, side of surgery, wristband placement, central venous line, IV line catheterization at the operating room, gauge, wristband removal, wristband replacement, time without wristbands, IV line and wristband in the same arm, and ward of origin. RESULTS: the study analyzed 153 cases; 100% of patients had an identification wristband, and 98% had blood type wristbands. It was necessary to remove 27% of the identification wristbands and 29% of the blood type wristbands due to incorrect placement; all of them were replaced. The mean time that the patient stayed at the operating room without a personal data wristband was 51.62 minutes, and 50.36 minutes without blood type wristband. CONCLUSIONS: the vast majority of patients were adequately identified through the two wristbands; though, for surgical requirements, in some cases these had to be removed, and patients were unidentified during approximately one hour. Communication and information with nurses becomes essential in order to improve the quality of care and patient safety

Effect of an educational programme on the attitudes towards patient safety of operation room nurses.

BACKGROUND: A culture of patient safety is one of the cornerstones of good-quality healthcare, and its provision is one of the significant challenges in healthcare environments. AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surgical safety educational programme on the attitudes of nurses to patient safety in operating rooms (OR). DESIGN: An interventional one-group pre-/post-test design, which sought to measure changes in OR nurses' attitudes toward patient safety culture. METHODS: A simple random sampling technique was used to recruit 66 OR nurses working at six Royal Medical Service hospitals in Amman, Jordan. All participants took part in a 4-hour educational workshop. Pre-tests and post-tests were done. RESULTS: The results of this study showed that OR nurses' attitudes towards a culture of patient safety was originally negative; significant improvement after attending the programme was found (3.3 ± 0.20 versus 3.8 ± 0.30). There was a negative correlation between years of experience and nurses' attitudes towards patient safety. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating courses about safety culture into continuing education programmes may improve nurses' attitudes towards patient safety. Nurses should be qualified to play an important role in creating a culture of patient safety.

The evolving roles of Operating Department Practitioners in contemporary healthcare: A service evaluation.

A mixed method study was undertaken to capture quantitative and qualitative data in relation to the contemporary roles and skills of Operating Department Practitioners. The data provide evidence that Operating Department Practitioners take opportunities to widen their knowledge skills and practice, with over 37% of the sample completing a mentorship qualification and 14% having completed or studying towards a postgraduate or Master's Degree. The study provides evidence of the development in the roles of the Operating Department Practitioner and suggests that Operating Department Practitioners offer an eclectic mix of skills which are delivered in a variety of clinical settings. It is recognised that Operating Department Practitioners have the potential to further improve patient safety and service delivery in roles other than those historically associated with the profession.

Adherence to the objectives of the Safe Surgery Saves Lives Initiative: perspective of nurses / Adesão aos objetivos do Programa Cirurgias Seguras Salvam Vidas: perspectiva de enfermeiros / Adherencia a los objetivos del Programa Cirugías Seguras Salvan Vidas: perspectiva de enfermeros

ABSTRACT Objective: to measure the adherence to the objectives of the Safe Surgery Saves Lives Initiative in surgical centers from the perspective of nurses. Method: cross-sectional study, developed through an online survey via the Google Forms® platform. The study participants were 220 nurses from surgical centers in different regions of Brazil. The data were collected through a socio-professional characterization form and a questionnaire in which the participants indicated their level of agreement in relation to the fulfillment of the objectives of the Safe Surgery Saves Lives Initiative. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. Results: objective 1, The team will operate on the correct patient at the correct site, presented the highest levels of total agreement (n = 144; 65.5%) and partial agreement (n = 52; 23.6%). Objective 10, Hospitals and the public health systems will establish routine surveillance of surgical capacity, volume and results, obtained the lowest percentages of total (n = 69, 31.4%) and partial agreement (n = 81, 36.8%). Conclusion: adherence to the objectives of the Initiative is adequate, but there are weaknesses, especially in relation to the prevention of never events.

RESUMO Objetivo: mensurar a adesão aos objetivos do Programa Cirurgias Seguras Salvam Vidas em centros cirúrgicos a partir da perspectiva de enfermeiros. Método: estudo transversal, desenvolvido por meio de um survey on-line via plataforma Google Forms ®. Os participantes da pesquisa foram 220 enfermeiros de centros cirúrgicos de diferentes regiões do Brasil. Os dados foram coletados por meio de uma ficha de caracterização socioprofissional e questionário em que os participantes indicavam seu nível de concordância em relação ao cumprimento dos objetivos do Programa Cirurgias Seguras Salvam Vidas. A análise dos dados foi realizada por meio de estatística descritiva. Resultados: o objetivo 1, operar o paciente certo e local cirúrgico certo, apresentou os maiores níveis de concordância total (n=144; 65,5%) e parcial (n=52; 23,6%). O objetivo 10, o hospital e os sistemas de saúde pública estabelecem vigilância de rotina sobre capacidade, volume e resultados cirúrgicos, obteve os menores percentuais de concordância total (n=69; 31,4%) e parcial (n=81; 36,8%). Conclusão: a adesão aos objetivos do Programa é adequada, mas há fragilidades especialmente em relação à prevenção de never events.

RESUMEN Objetivo: medir la adherencia a los objetivos del Programa Cirugías Seguras Salvan Vidas en centros quirúrgicos desde la perspectiva de enfermeros. Método: estudio transversal, desarrollado por medio de survey on-line vía plataforma Google Forms ®. Los participantes de la investigación fueron 220 enfermeros de centros quirúrgicos de diferentes regiones de Brasil. Los datos fueron recolectados por medio de una ficha de caracterización socioprofesional y cuestionario en que los participantes indicaban su nivel de concordancia en relación al cumplimiento de los objetivos del Programa Cirugías Seguras Salvan Vidas. El análisis de los datos fue realizado por medio de estadística descriptiva. Resultados: el objetivo 1, operar el paciente correcto y local quirúrgico cierto, presentó los mayores niveles de concordancia total (n=144, 65,5%) y parcial (n=52; 23,6%). El objetivo 10, el hospital y los sistemas de salud pública establecen vigilancia de rutina sobre capacidad, volumen y resultados quirúrgicos, obtuvo los menores porcentuales de concordancia total (n=69; 31,4%) y parcial (n=81; 36, 8%). Conclusión: la adherencia a los objetivos del Programa es adecuada, pero hay fragilidades especialmente en relación a la prevención de never events.

The Role of the RN Circulator in a Navigated Posterior Spinal Fusion: 1.3 www.aornjournal.org/content/cme.

The RN circulator plays a vital role in preparing for a minimally invasive spinal fusion with navigation by confirming that the necessary equipment and stakeholders are available and ensuring that the amount of equipment and the number of people in the room do not compromise patient safety or the sterility of the surgical field. Patients who undergo minimally invasive spinal fusion experience less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and reduced costs than those who undergo open spinal fusion procedures. The overall successful fusion rates and improvement in patient quality of life are equivalent between the two approaches. Using navigation during minimally invasive and open spinal fusion procedures decreases radiation exposure to the patient and surgical team and helps ensure a more accurate placement of pedicle screws compared with nonnavigated minimally invasive or open spinal fusions.

Barriers and facilitators for implementing the WHO's safety surgical checklist: A focus group study among nurses.

The World Health's Organization's safety surgical checklist has been described as a means for increasing patient safety during surgical procedures. However, its full implementation has not yet been achieved worldwide. The aim of this study, via a focus group study among nurses, was to explore the factors that serve as barriers and facilitators for the list's implementation. Findings reveal that the use of the checklist can be compromised by many factors but also supported by others.

Increasing operating room efficiency through electronic medical record analysis.

We used electronic medical record (EMR) analysis to determine errors in operating room (OR) time utilisation. Over a two year period EMR data of 44,503 surgical procedures was analysed for OR duration, on-time, first case, and add-on time performance, within 19 surgical specialties. Maximal OR time utilisation at our institution could have saved over 302,620 min or 5,044 hours of OR efficiency over a two year period. Most specialties (78.95%) had inaccurately scheduled procedure times and therefore used the OR more than their scheduled allotment time. Significant differences occurred between the mean scheduled surgical durations (101.38 ± 87.11 min) and actual durations (108.18 ± 102.27 min; P < 0.001). Significant differences also occurred between the mean scheduled add-on durations (111.4 ± 75.5 min) and the actual add-on scheduled durations (118.6 ± 90.1 minutes; P < 0.001). EMR quality improvement analysis can be used to determine scheduling error and bias, in order to improve efficiency and increase OR time utilisation.

Just a routine operation: a critical discussion.

This article has summarised a critical discussion of the human factors that contributed to the death of a patient from a failure to respond appropriately to a 'can't intubate, can't ventilate' scenario. The contributory factors included the clinical team's inability to communicate, prioritise tasks and demonstrate effective leadership and assertive followership. The film Just a routine operation has now been in circulation for several years. When a system is designed and introduced with the intention of making a change to clinical practice, it can quickly become just another component of an organisation's architecture and complacency around its use can develop. This article has been written specifically for perioperative practitioners to renew the debate around the human factors that contribute to patient harm. By critically discussing Just a routine operation and attempting to review why the incident occurred, this article has attempted to emphasise that some of the conditions and behaviours that contributed to the death of Elaine Bromiley may be latent within our organisations and teams, and may continue to contribute to failures that affect patient safety.

Indicadores de asistencia en un clínica quirúrgica / Indicadores de assistência em uma clínica cirúrgica / Indicators of care in a surgical clinic

Se objetivó caracterizar las hospitalizaciones ocurridas en la Clínica Quirúrgica de un hospital universitario del Centro Oeste de Brasil. Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, transversal, realizado a través de los registros en un total de 750 admisiones. La colecta fue de enero a mayo de 2011, con instrumento estructurado y validado. Se realizó análisis estadístico descriptivo. Se encontró que la mayoría de los ingresos fue electiva (82,1%), con duración de la estancia hospitalaria entre dos y ocho días para el 82,2% de los ingresos. Al menos una intervención quirúrgica se registró en 85,9% de las hospitalizaciones y los médicos fueron los profesionales con una mayor participación en la evolución del paciente, mientras que la enfermera presentó registro de evaluación en 19,2% de las hospitalizaciones. Destaca la necesidad de los profesionales de repensar sus acciones a través de la atención de la salud y que las instituciones realicen la sistematización del proceso de evaluación de los indicadores clínicos en busca de la calidad y seguridad del paciente en la práctica clínica (AU)

Este objetivou caracterizar as internações ocorridas na Clínica Cirúrgica de um hospital universitário do Centro Oeste do Brasil. Estudo descritivo, retrospectivo, de delineamento transversal, realizado por meio de prontuários em um total de 750 internações. A coleta foi de janeiro a maio do ano de 2011, com instrumento estruturado e validado. Realizada análise estatística descritiva. Constatou-se que a maioria das admissões foi eletiva (82,1%), com tempo de internação entre dois e oito dias para 82,2% das internações. Pelo menos uma intervenção cirúrgica foi registrada em 85,9% das internações e os médicos foram os profissionais com maior participação na evolução do paciente, enquanto que o enfermeiro apresentou registro de avaliação em 19,2% das internações. Evidencia-se a necessidade dos profissionais repensarem suas ações frente ao cuidado em saúde e que as instituições realizem a sistematização do processo de avaliação dos indicadores da assistência, em busca de qualidade e segurança do paciente na prática clínica (AU)

This study aimed to characterize the hospitalizations occurred in the Surgical Clinic of a university hospital in the Midwest of Brazil. Descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional study, carried out based on medical records for a total of 750 admissions. Collection of data took place from January to May of 2011 with aid of a structured and validated instrument. Descriptive statistical analyses were carried out. It was found that most admissions were elective (82.1%), with length of stay between two and eight days for 82.2% admissions. At least one surgery was recorded in 85.9% of the hospitalizations and doctors were professionals with high participation in the evolution of the patient, while the nurse presented evaluation record in 19.2% of the admissions. This highlights the need for professionals to rethink their actions in the health care and for the institutions to perform the systematization of the process of evaluation of clinical indicators, searching for quality and safety of the patient in the clinical practice (AU)

Measuring Registered Nurses' Medication Competence in Specialty Settings: An Operating Room Registered Nurse Example.

Nursing professional development practitioners play an active, vital role in shaping, implementing, and evaluating competency models in their organizations. This article describes a process for developing and continuously improving knowledge assessment examinations, one component of a competency model. The article defends the use of specialty-specific medication knowledge assessment examinations. The authors recommend future investigations to link nurses' knowledge assessment results to performance in practice and to analyze costs and benefits of knowledge assessment examinations.